FCBLComish
  1. Kurt Von Haller Roulette Lexikon Pdf

I bet Kurt Von Haller made more money selling his book than he did playing roulette

Dec 19, 2018  Hello, I am new in this forum and would like to ask a question regarding European Roulette. (Single Zero Roulette) In the Roulette Lexikon from Kurt von Haller he writes, that the last open number should show up on average after 132 spins. Von Kurt von Haller (Autor) Alle Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden. Preis Neu ab. Zugleich Lehrbuch und Tabellenwerk der Wahrscheinlichkeitsmathematik des Rouletts 5,0 von 5 Sternen 2. Gebundene Ausgabe.


If he made $1 selling books, then this statement is true. Come to think of it, even if he lost money on his book it is probably still true.
Beware, I work for the dark side.... We have cookies
Wizard
Administrator
If the question is how long will it take for every number to appear in double-zero roulette, the answer is 160.6602765, on average. This is the sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
mustangsally

If the question is how long will it take for every number to appear in double-zero roulette, the answer is 160.6602765, on average. This is the sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38.

the OP questions 37. Where it came from
that is just 1/p where p=1/37
handy tables
0 Roulette (155.4586903)
# of numbersaverage # of spinscumulative sum
111
21.0277777782.027777778
31.0571428573.084920635
41.0882352944.173155929
51.1212121215.29436805
61.156256.45061805
71.1935483877.644166437
81.2333333338.877499771
91.27586206910.15336184
101.32142857111.47479041
111.3703703712.84516078
121.42307692314.2682377
131.4815.7482377
141.54166666717.28990437
151.60869565218.89860002
161.68181818220.58041821
171.76190476222.34232297
181.8524.19232297
191.94736842126.13969139
202.05555555628.19524694
212.17647058830.37171753
222.312532.68421753
232.46666666735.1508842
242.64285714337.79374134
252.84615384640.63989519
263.08333333343.72322852
273.36363636447.08686488
283.750.78686488
294.11111111154.897976
304.62559.522976
315.28571428664.80869028
326.16666666770.97535695
337.478.37535695
349.2587.62535695
3512.3333333399.95869028
3618.5118.4586903
3737155.4586903

The average is not the mode (The 'mode' is the value that occurs most often)
or median (The 'median' is the 'middle' value or close to 50%)
median = spin 147 @ 0.501522154
mode = 133 @ 0.0106293156
00 Roulette (160.6602765)
# of numbersaverage # of spinscumulative sum
111
21.0270270272.027027027
31.0555555563.082582583
41.0857142864.168296868
51.1176470595.285943927
61.1515151526.437459079
71.18757.624959079
81.2258064528.85076553
91.26666666710.1174322
101.31034482811.42777702
111.35714285712.78491988
121.40740740714.19232729
131.46153846215.65386575
141.5217.17386575
151.58333333318.75719908
161.65217391320.409373
171.72727272722.13664572
181.8095238123.94616953
191.925.84616953
20227.84616953
212.11111111129.95728064
222.23529411832.19257476
232.37534.56757476
242.53333333337.1009081
252.71428571439.81519381
262.92307692342.73827073
273.16666666745.9049374
283.45454545549.35948285
293.853.15948285
304.22222222257.38170508
314.7562.13170508
325.42857142967.56027651
336.33333333373.89360984
347.681.49360984
359.590.99360984
3612.66666667103.6602765
3719122.6602765
3838160.6602765

Kurt Von Haller Roulette Lexikon Pdf


median = spin 152 @ 0.501599171
mode = 138 @ 0.010333952
still interesting one brings up this question
Sally
I Heart Vi Hart
TomG

If the question is how long will it take for every number to appear in double-zero roulette, the answer is 160.6602765, on average. This is the sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38.


The sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38 is 4.2279020133. Using the inverse of every integer, it would take like 10^70 of them to get to 160. (160.66 is the harmonic series up to 38 times 38; using 37 for single zero roulette it is is 155)
(I learned this one when calculating the expected longest drought for a Super Bowl or World Series)
mustangsally

(160.66 is the harmonic series up to 38 times 38; using 37 for single zero roulette it is is 155)

being specific using pari/gp calculator found here
https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/gp.html
a=sum(k=1,37,37/(37-(k-1)))
0 Roulette
00 Roulette
this is the short way to an answer
Sally
I Heart Vi Hart
Wizard
Administrator

The sum of the inverse of every integer from 1 to 38 is 4.2279020133. Using the inverse of every integer, it would take like 10^70 of them to get to 160. (160.66 is the harmonic series up to 38 times 38; using 37 for single zero roulette it is is 155)


You're right. I forgot to say to multiply by 38.
Last edited by: Wizard on Dec 20, 2018
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
masterj
Thanks guys!
Wizard
Administrator

the OP questions 37. Where it came from
that is just 1/p where p=1/37
The average is not the mode (The 'mode' is the value that occurs most often)
or median (The 'median' is the 'middle' value or close to 50%)
median = spin 147 @ 0.501522154
mode = 133 @ 0.0106293156


HallerI agree on the median. Here is my transition matrix.
0.0270.97300000000000000000000000000000000000
00.05410.94590000000000000000000000000000000000
000.08110.9189000000000000000000000000000000000
0000.10810.891900000000000000000000000000000000
00000.13510.86490000000000000000000000000000000
000000.16220.8378000000000000000000000000000000
0000000.18920.810800000000000000000000000000000
00000000.21620.78380000000000000000000000000000
000000000.24320.7568000000000000000000000000000
0000000000.27030.729700000000000000000000000000
00000000000.29730.70270000000000000000000000000
000000000000.32430.6757000000000000000000000000
0000000000000.35140.648600000000000000000000000
00000000000000.37840.62160000000000000000000000
000000000000000.40540.5946000000000000000000000
0000000000000000.43240.567600000000000000000000
00000000000000000.45950.54050000000000000000000
000000000000000000.48650.5135000000000000000000
0000000000000000000.51350.486500000000000000000
00000000000000000000.54050.45950000000000000000
000000000000000000000.56760.4324000000000000000
0000000000000000000000.59460.405400000000000000
00000000000000000000000.62160.37840000000000000
000000000000000000000000.64860.3514000000000000
0000000000000000000000000.67570.324300000000000
00000000000000000000000000.70270.29730000000000
000000000000000000000000000.72970.2703000000000
0000000000000000000000000000.75680.243200000000
00000000000000000000000000000.78380.21620000000
000000000000000000000000000000.81080.1892000000
0000000000000000000000000000000.83780.162200000
00000000000000000000000000000000.86490.13510000
000000000000000000000000000000000.89190.1081000
0000000000000000000000000000000000.91890.081100
00000000000000000000000000000000000.94590.05410
000000000000000000000000000000000000.9730.027
0000000000000000000000000000000000001

If the table is too big, cell (x,x) = x/37 and cell (x,x+1) = (37-x)/37), and every other cell is zero.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
7craps

I agree on the median. Here is my transition matrix.

to point out little differences in building a transition matrix (both are correct, one needs some special attention after calculations)
The Wizard's transition matrix (where rows sum to 1) starts with the 1st spin already completed.
I was taught to always start at 0 to make sure one does not forget to add 1 to calculations of the matrix.
(both methods are perfectly fine to use)
My TM is A, the Wizards is B (in the photo below - Wizard's values have been rounded down)
the column 1,2,3,4 is the row number and not the 'state name' for Matrix A but is correct for Matrix B
(Matrix A row names is just the row value - 1)
after raising the Wizards TM to the 146th power
(in the photo below)
we find the median (0.50141 - values have been rounded)
we must add 1 to 146 = 147 for the median (for the example 37 number Roulette)
distribution to only 160 spins
using R code section 3r.
https://sites.google.com/view/krapstuff/coupon-collecting

remember, we can only raise a square matrix to a power (as in B^146)
Enjoy
winsome johnny (not Win some johnny)
ThatDonGuy
How about a math proof?

Assume there are N numbers, and K of them have already come up at least once.
This is equivalent to, 'If you have N balls, K of which are red and the other N-K are white, how many draws with replacement (i.e. when you draw a ball, you put it back) should it take before you draw a white ball?'
The probability of doing it in exactly D draws is (K / N)D-1 x (N - K) / N
= (KD-1 (N - K)) / ND
The expected number is
1 x (N - K) / N
+ 2 x K (N - K) / N2
+ 3 x K2 (N - K) / N3
+ 4 x K3 (N - K) / N4
+ ...
= (N - K) / N x (1 + 2 (K / N) + 3 (K / N)2 + 4 (K / N)3 + ...)
= (N - K) / N x (1 + (K / N) + (K / N)2 + (K / N)3 + ...)2
= (N - K) / N x (1 / (1 - (K / N))2, since K < N
= (N - K) / N x (1 / ((N - K) / N))2
= (N - K) / N x (N / (N - K))2
= (N - K) / N x N2 / (N - K)2
= N / (N - K)
At the start, K = 0; after each number is drawn for the first time, K increases by 1.
The total number is the number needed to get the first number + the number to get the
second different number once you have already drawn one + the number needed to get the
third different number once you have already drawn two different numbers + ... + the number
needed to get the Nth different number once you have already drawn N-1 different numbers
This is is N / N + N / (N-1) + N / (N-2) + ... + N / 2 + N
= N x (1 / N + 1 / (N-1) + ... + 1 / 3 + 1 / 2 + 1)